Skip to main content
Understanding Your Options

Different Approaches to Digital Proof

Not all proof platforms work the same way. Here's how the major approaches compare.

Four Main Approaches

Each approach has trade-offs. The right choice depends on your needs.

Blockchain-Only Platforms

Hash content and anchor it to a blockchain (Bitcoin, Ethereum, or proprietary chains).

+Decentralized, no single point of failure
+Immutable once confirmed
Confirmation delays (10+ minutes for Bitcoin)
Less established in legal precedent

Traditional TSA (RFC 3161)

Timestamps from accredited Time Stamp Authorities following IETF standards.

+Instant timestamps
+Established legal precedent since 2001
Centralized (trust the TSA)
TSA must remain operational

C2PA / Content Credentials

Industry coalition standard for media provenance (Adobe, Microsoft, Intel, etc.).

+Embedded in media files
+Edit history tracking
Primarily for images/video
Requires compatible software
CertNode Approach

Multi-Layer Architecture

Combine RFC 3161 timestamps with blockchain anchoring for redundant verification.

+3-layer chain: CertNode signature, RFC 3161 TSA, Bitcoin anchor
+Three independent verification paths
+Legal precedent + blockchain permanence
More complex architecture

How CertNode Works

Multi-layer timestamp architecture for maximum reliability.

LAYER 1

Signature Layer

  • • ES256 (ECDSA P-256) on AI-Provenance receipts
  • • HMAC-SHA256 integrity seal on commerce records
  • • Tamper-evident: any change breaks it
  • • Provenance signatures verifiable with the public key
LAYER 2

RFC 3161 Timestamps

  • • IETF standard since 2001
  • • Independent TSA (FreeTSA)
  • • Instant verification
  • • Established legal precedent
LAYER 3

Bitcoin Anchoring

  • • OpenTimestamps protocol
  • • Merkle roots every ~10 minutes
  • • Blockchain-level permanence
  • • Independent of CertNode

Result: Every CertNode receipt carries an ES256 signature plus an RFC 3161 timestamp from an independent authority and a Bitcoin anchor — three independent verification paths.

Quick Comparison

ConsiderationBlockchain-OnlyTraditional TSAC2PAMulti-Layer
Timestamp speed10+ minInstantInstantInstant
Legal precedentEmergingEstablishedNewEstablished on the RFC 3161 layer
DecentralizationFullCentralizedVariesHybrid
Content typesAny hashAny hashMedia filesAny content
Verification paths1113

When to Use What

Choose blockchain-only if:

  • • Decentralization is your top priority
  • • You can wait for confirmation
  • • You're in crypto-native industries

Choose traditional TSA if:

  • • Legal compliance is critical
  • • You need instant verification
  • • You're in regulated industries

Choose C2PA if:

  • • You work primarily with images/video
  • • Edit history tracking matters
  • • You use Adobe/Microsoft tools

Choose multi-layer (CertNode) if:

  • • You need both speed and permanence
  • • Redundancy matters for disputes
  • • You want multiple verification options

Ready to Get Started?

Try CertNode's multi-layer proof infrastructure. 60-day trial, cancel anytime.